Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

In re M.W.

In re M.W.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 23, 2016 · Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer, Re, Stated
150 Ohio St. 3d 20; 2016 Ohio 5452; 78 N.E.3d 827

In re M.W.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑