Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

State v. Bell

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 2, 2016 · Appeal, Connor, Cross, Donnell, French, Imposed, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer, Reinstate, Respect, Trial

150 Ohio St. 3d 23; 2016 Ohio 7560; 78 N.E.3d 830

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Bell (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Jones, 148 Ohio St.3d 167, 2016-Ohio-5105, 69 N.E.3d 688, with respect to the issues raised in the appeal, and on the authority of State v. Thomas, 148 Ohio St.3d 248, 2016-Ohio-5567, 70 N.E.3d 496, with respect to the issues raised in the cross-appeal.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee and cross-appellant. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Erika B. Cunliffe, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant and cross-appellee. O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., concur with respect to the appeal, dissent with respect to the cross-appeal, and would reinstate the sentence imposed by the trial court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.