Taylor v. Crosby

Ohio Supreme Court
Taylor v. Crosby, 150 Ohio St. 3d 344 (Ohio 2016)
2016 Ohio 5820; 81 N.E.3d 1223
Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer

Taylor v. Crosby

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act.

O'Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published