Taylor v. Crosby
Ohio Supreme Court
Taylor v. Crosby, 150 Ohio St. 3d 344 (Ohio 2016)
2016 Ohio 5820; 81 N.E.3d 1223
Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer
Taylor v. Crosby
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act.
Reference
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published