Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

Taylor v. Crosby

Taylor v. Crosby
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 2016 · Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer
150 Ohio St. 3d 344; 2016 Ohio 5820; 81 N.E.3d 1223
Taylor v. Crosby

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act.

O'Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.