Ohio Supreme Court, 2016

Taylor v. Crosby

Taylor v. Crosby
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 2016 · Connor, Donnell, French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, Neill, Pfeifer
150 Ohio St. 3d 344; 2016 Ohio 5820; 81 N.E.3d 1223

Taylor v. Crosby

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act.

O'Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.