{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Ronnie Perry, for a writ of habeas corpus.

{¶ 2} In 2013, Perry was convicted in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas of drug offenses in two separate cases. He was sentenced to a total of nine years in prison. Perry contends that the jury-verdict forms in both cases were insufficient to support his convictions and that the most he could have been sentenced to was either one or two years. Because he has served more than three years, Perry contends that he is entitled to immediate release. The court of appeals granted the motion of appellee, Warden Brigham Sloan, to dismiss the petition.

{¶ 3} Habeas corpus is not available to challenge the validity of verdict forms. Wells v. Hudson, 113 Ohio St.3d 308, 2007-Ohio-1955, 865 N.E.2d 46, ¶ 8. Perry’s “claims of erroneous * * * verdict forms could have been raised in his direct appeal from his criminal convictions and sentences.” Smith v. Mitchell, 80 Ohio St.3d 624, 625, 687 N.E.2d 749 (1998). Therefore, Perry had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law and is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. Id.

{¶ 4} Perry claims that he does not have an adequate remedy, because his appellate attorney failed to raise a challenge to the verdict forms on direct appeal. However, Perry could have filed an application to reopen his appeal under App.R. 26(B) based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The availability of adequate remedies at law, even if those remedies were not sought or were unsuccessful, precludes a writ of habeas corpus. State ex rel. O’Neal v. Bunting, 140 Ohio St.3d 339, 2014-Ohio-4037, 18 N.E.3d 430, ¶ 14-15.

Judgment affirmed.