Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.
Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.
148 Ohio St. 3d 1414; 2017 Ohio 644; 69 N.E.3d 752
Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.
Opinion of the Court
Cuyahoga App. No. 104279, 2016-Ohio-8313. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.
Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Dan Himmelfarb, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.