Ohio Supreme Court, 2017

State v. Upkins

State v. Upkins
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 17, 2017 · Accept, Dewine, Donnell, Kennedy, Law, Neill, Propositions
149 Ohio St. 3d 1405; 2017 Ohio 2822; 74 N.E.3d 464
State v. Upkins

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Shelby App. No. 17-16-04. Discretionary appeal accepted on proposition of law No. IV. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated as follows:

“When appellate counsel also served as trial counsel and moves to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, the court shall permit counsel to withdraw and must then appoint new appellate counsel to review the record and raise any honfrivolous appealable issue.”
O’Neill, J., would accept the cause on all propositions of law. O’Donnell, Kennedy, and DeWine, J., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.