Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney
Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney
Opinion
{¶ 1}
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Thomas Patrick Maney Jr., Attorney
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 6, 2017, in which the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
{¶ 5}
For earlier case, see
Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney
,
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney.
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- On application for reinstatement.