Ohio Supreme Court, 2018

State ex rel. Robinson v. Adult Parole Auth.

State ex rel. Robinson v. Adult Parole Auth.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 24, 2018
96 N.E.3d 283; 152 Ohio St. 3d 391; 2018 Ohio 558 (North Eastern Reporter, Third Series)
State ex rel. Robinson v. Adult Parole Auth.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

*391{¶ 1} Appellant, Damon Robinson, commenced this action in the Tenth District *284Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus against appellee, Ohio Adult Parole Authority. The court of appeals referred the case to a magistrate, and on July 25, 2016, the magistrate purported to dismiss the petition sua sponte. On November 30, 2017, we affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals. --- Ohio St.3d ----, 2017-Ohio-8721, --- N.E.3d ----.

{¶ 2} Upon further consideration, however, we conclude that we lacked jurisdiction to hear and decide the case. Proceedings before a magistrate are governed by Civ.R. 53, as expressly incorporated by Loc.R. 13(M)(1) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals. Under that rule, a "magistrate's decision is not effective unless adopted by the court." Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(a). For this reason, a magistrate's decision, standing alone, is not a final, appealable order. See State ex rel. Boddie v. Franklin Cty. 911 Admr. , 135 Ohio St.3d 248, 2013-Ohio-401, 985 N.E.2d 1263. Because the court of appeals did not adopt the magistrate's decision, Robinson never received a final, appealable order.

*392{¶ 3} We hereby withdraw the prior opinion and order it withdrawn from official publication. It therefore has no precedential value. See In re Adoption of Ridenour , 61 Ohio St.3d 319, 327, 574 N.E.2d 1055 (1991), fn. 6. We dismiss this appeal for lack of a final, appealable order.

Cause dismissed.

O'Connor, C.J., and French, O'Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O'Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., concur in judgment only.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.