Ohio Supreme Court, 2018

Menlo Realty Income Props. 28, L. L.C. v. Franklin Cnty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 25, 2018

120 N.E.3d 818; 2018 Ohio 4305; 155 Ohio St. 3d 258 (North Eastern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Menlo Realty Income Properties 28, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2018)
Menlo Realty Income Properties 28, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Because the Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") did not fully consider the appraisal evidence presented by appellant, Menlo Realty Income Properties 28, L.L.C., we vacate the decision of the BTA and remand the cause for further proceedings on the authority of Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision , 150 Ohio St.3d 527, 2017-Ohio-4415, 83 N.E.3d 916, and Spirit Master Funding IX, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision , 155 Ohio St.3d 254, 2018-Ohio-4302, 120 N.E.3d 815. On remand, the parties shall not be permitted to present new evidence. See *819Bronx Park S. III Lancaster, L.L.C. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision , 153 Ohio St.3d 550, 2018-Ohio-1589, 108 N.E.3d 1079, ¶ 13.

Decision vacated and cause remanded.

O'Connor, C.J., and O'Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, DeWine, and DeGenaro, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.