Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. McNally
Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. McNally
Opinion
*1293
{¶ 1}
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Aloysius McNally IV, Attorney
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 18, 2018, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
{¶ 5}
For earlier case, see
Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. McNally
,
O'Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, French, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- On application for reinstatement.