Ohio Supreme Court, 2020

State v. Diehl (Slip Opinion)

State v. Diehl (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 15, 2020
2020 Ohio 3695

State v. Diehl (Slip Opinion)

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Diehl, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3695.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2020-OHIO-3695 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DIEHL, A.K.A. TER DOEST, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Diehl, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3695.]

Court of appeals’ judgment vacated on the authority of State v. Howard and cause remanded. (No. 2019-1588―Submitted July 8, 2020―Decided July 15, 2020.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Wood County, No. WD-18-041, 2019-Ohio-3818. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Howard, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2020-Ohio-3195, __ N.E.3d __.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, and STEWART, JJ., concur. _________________ SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold and James A. Hoppenjans, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant, state of Ohio. Thomas P. Kurt, for appellee, Amanda Diehl. _________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.