Ohio Supreme Court, 2020

Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze

Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 1, 2020
162 N.E.3d 836; 161 Ohio St. 3d 1239; 2020 Ohio 4680 (North Eastern Reporter, Third Series)

Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze

Opinion

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-4680.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SPINAZZE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2020-Ohio-4680.] (No. 2019-1075—Submitted September 29, 2020—Decided October 1, 2020.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Anthony Perin Spinazze, Attorney Registration No. 0071893, last known business address in Sylvania, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 17, 2020, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Spinazze, 159 Ohio St.3d 187, 2020-Ohio-957, 149 N.E.3d 503.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, and STEWART, JJ., concur. ________________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.