Ohio Supreme Court, 2021

Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall

Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 8, 2021
186 N.E.3d 842; 166 Ohio St. 3d 1240; 2021 Ohio 3605 (North Eastern Reporter, Third Series)

Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall

Opinion

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3605.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MARSHALL. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2021-Ohio-3605.] (No. 2018-0809—Submitted October 6, 2021—Decided October 8, 2021.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on January 28, 2021, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Michael J.

Marshall, Attorney Registration No. 0065767. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(25)(E), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Professional Conduct. The board filed its final report in this court on August 6, 2021, recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. No objections to said final report were filed, and this cause was considered by the court. {¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that the petition for reinstatement of respondent is granted and that respondent, Michael J.

Marshall, last known address in Steubenville, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. {¶ 3} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 4} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall, 155 Ohio St.3d 208, 2018-Ohio-4174, 120 N.E.3d 772.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.