Ohio Supreme Court, 2022

Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp

Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 29, 2022 · No. 2021-0757
170 Ohio St. 3d 1241; 210 N.E.3d 560; 2022 Ohio 4239
Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4239.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. REPP. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4239.] (No. 2021-0757—Submitted November 28, 2022—Decided November 29, 2022.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Judge Mark Edward Repp, Attorney Registration No. 0058853, last known business address in Tiffin, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 9, 2021, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).

{¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Repp, 165 Ohio St.3d 582, 2021-Ohio-3923, 180 N.E.3d 1128. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur.

_________________

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.