State v. Jenkins

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Jenkins, 171 Ohio St. 3d 795 (Ohio 2022)
220 N.E.3d 791; 2022 Ohio 4731

State v. Jenkins

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Jenkins, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4731.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-4731 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. JENKINS, APPELLEE. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Jenkins, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4731.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Bourn and cause remanded for further proceedings. (No. 2022-0297―Submitted November 29, 2022―Decided December 30, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 109421, 2022-Ohio-297. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bourn, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-4321, __ N.E.3d __, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, and DEWINE, JJ., concur. DONNELLY and STEWART, JJ., would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently allowed. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

BRUNNER, J., dissents for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in Bourn. _________________ Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel T. Van, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. _________________

2

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
Court of appeals' judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Bourn and cause remanded for further proceedings.