[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 

.]




                     DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WASHINGTON.
         [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington, 

.]
(No. 1996-2787—Submitted November 13, 2024—Decided November 19, 2024.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, William Terry Washington, Attorney

 last known address in Tracy, California.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 11, 1997, wherein
the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from
the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has complied
with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the State of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington, 1997-Ohio-
186.
        KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and DETERS,
JJ., concur.
        BRUNNER, J., not participating.
                                  _________________


[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington, 

.]




                     DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WASHINGTON.
         [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington, 

.]
(No. 1996-2787—Submitted November 13, 2024—Decided November 19, 2024.)
                        ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
                                ____________________
        {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an
application for reinstatement by respondent, William Terry Washington, Attorney

 last known address in Tracy, California.
        {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 11, 1997, wherein
the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from
the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has complied
with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
        {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to
the practice of law in the State of Ohio.
        {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies
of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be
made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2).
        {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington, 1997-Ohio-
186.
        KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and DETERS,
JJ., concur.
        BRUNNER, J., not participating.
                                  _________________