State v. Shockey
State v. Shockey
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 90.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SHOCKEY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Shockey, 2024-Ohio-5176.]
Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded for application of State v. Mays. (No. 2024-0298―Submitted October 22, 2024―Decided October 31, 2024.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-23-22, 2024-Ohio-296. __________________ The judgment of the court set forth below was joined by KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, and DETERS, JJ. DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., dissented and would affirm the court of appeals’ judgment for the reasons set forth in Justice Brunner’s dissenting opinion in Mays.
{¶ 1} The judgment of the Third District Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for application of State v. Mays, 2024-Ohio- 4616. __________________ Raymond A. Grogan Jr., Marion County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Campbell Law, L.L.C., and April F. Campbell, for appellee, Douglas Shockey. __________________
Opinion
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.