[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 174 Ohio St.3d 211.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HEFLIN, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Heflin, 2024-Ohio-449.]

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Daniel and State v. Hacker. (No. 2022-1637―Submitted February 6, 2024―Decided February 13, 2024.)

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wood County, No. WD-22-006. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Daniel, 173 Ohio St.3d 270, 2023-Ohio-4035, 229 N.E.3d 81, and State v. Hacker, 173 Ohio St.3d 219, 2023-Ohio-2535, 229 N.E.3d 38.

KENNEDY, C.J., and DEWINE, STEWART, and DETERS, JJ., concur.

FISCHER and BRUNNER, JJ., concur in judgment only for the reasons set forth in their separate opinions in Daniel.

DONNELLY, J., dissents. _________________ Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Jeffrey P. Nunnari, for appellant, Ronnie Heflin. _________________