State v. Heflin

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Heflin, 2024 Ohio 449 (Ohio 2024)

State v. Heflin

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State
v. Heflin, Slip Opinion No. 
2024-Ohio-449
.]




                                           NOTICE
      This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an
      advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to
      promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65
      South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other
      formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before
      the opinion is published.




                           SLIP OPINION NO. 
2024-OHIO-449
             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HEFLIN, APPELLANT.
  [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it
        may be cited as State v. Heflin, Slip Opinion No. 
2024-Ohio-449
.]
Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Daniel and State
        v. Hacker.
  (No. 2022-1637―Submitted February 6, 2024―Decided February 13, 2024.)
      CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wood County, No. WD-22-006.
                                   __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Daniel, __ Ohio St.3d __, 
2023-Ohio-4035
, __ N.E.3d __, and State v.
Hacker, __ Ohio St.3d __, 
2023-Ohio-2535
, __ N.E.3d __.
        KENNEDY, C.J., and DEWINE, STEWART, and DETERS, JJ., concur.
        FISCHER and BRUNNER, JJ., concur in judgment only for the reasons set
forth in their separate opinions in Daniel.
        DONNELLY, J., dissents.
                                    _________________
                            SUPREME COURT OF OHIO




       Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
       Jeffrey P. Nunnari, for appellant, Ronnie Heflin.
                              _________________




                                        2


Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Daniel and State v. Hacker.