Ohio Supreme Court, 2025

Disciplinary Counsel v. Russ

Disciplinary Counsel v. Russ
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 4, 2025
2025 Ohio 1984

Disciplinary Counsel v. Russ

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at __ Ohio St.3d __.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUSS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Russ, 2025-Ohio-____.] (No. 2022-1512—Submitted June 3, 2025—Decided June 4, 2025.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an amended application for reinstatement by respondent, Andrew Edward Russ, Attorney Registration No. 0074974, last known business address in Pickerington, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 27, 2023, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with one year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Russ, 2023-Ohio-1337.

KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, BRUNNER, DETERS, HAWKINS, and SHANAHAN, JJ., concur. _________________

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at __ Ohio St.3d __.]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RUSS. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Russ, 2025-Ohio-1984.] (No. 2022-1512—Submitted June 3, 2025—Decided June 4, 2025.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. ____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an amended application for reinstatement by respondent, Andrew Edward Russ, Attorney Registration No. 0074974, last known business address in Pickerington, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 27, 2023, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with one year stayed on condition, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Russ, 2023-Ohio-1337.

KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, BRUNNER, DETERS, HAWKINS, and SHANAHAN, JJ., concur. _________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.