On the 9th day of December, 1909, judgment was pronounced against appellant in the two above-numbered cases for violations of the prohibitory liquor law, and in each case his punishment was assessed at 30 da)'®’ confinement in the county jail and a fine of $150.

In each case he was granted 60 days within which to prepare and serve a case-made. The record shows that a case-made-ivas served on the county attorney in both of the above cases, but fails to show that it was served within the time allowed by the-trial court. This is not a compliance with the law. The record must positively and affirmatively show that the case-made was served upon the county attorney within the time fixed by the trial court for that purpose, or the case-made will be stricken from the-the record. Cohn v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 492, 113 Pac. 219. The case-made in each case is therefore stricken from the record.

We find no error in the transcript of the record in either case, and both judgments are therefore affirmed.