The plaintiff in 'error was convicted in the county court of Cleveland county on the 22d day of January, 1909, on a charge of disturbing relig.ous worship and has perfected his appeal in this court. On the 9th day of January, 1911, the Attorney General filed a confession of error in this case admitting that the trial court erred in i'ts instruction to the jury on the credibility of the defendant as a witness in his own behalf. The- confession of error is weil taken, and is sustained. The cause is reversed and remanded to the county court of Cleveland county With directions to that court to grant the ■plaintiff in error a new trial.