Stevens v. City of Tulsa
Stevens v. City of Tulsa
238 P. 1119; 31 Okla. Crim. 242; 1925 OK CR 396; 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 412
Stevens v. City of Tulsa
Opinion of the Court
This was a conviction, on information charging a violation of a city ordinance defining vagrancy. The city attorney has confessed error, and asks that the judgment of the municipal court of the City of Tulsa be reversed. An examination of the record discloses that the confession of error is well taken, and for insufficiency of the evidence, and upon authority of the case of Campbell v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 39, 237 P. 133, the judgment of the municipal court is reversed
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.