Bayouth v. State
Bayouth v. State
267 P. 687; 40 Okla. Crim. 160; 1928 OK CR 200; 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 156
Bayouth v. State
Opinion of the Court
On a petition for rehearing it is earnestly urged that the punishment assessed is excessive and that justice requires that the judgment should be modified. We have again examined the record and are of the opinion that this contention is well founded.
The judgment (39 Okla. Cr. 8, 262 P. 702) is there *161 fore modified to the extent of striking out the imprisonment assessed. The petition for rehearing is overruled. Mandate forthwith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.