The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Garvin county for selling one pint of corn whisky to one Willie Hays, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The plaintiff in error questions the sufficiency of the evidence, but a careful examination of the record reveals sufficient competent evidence to> support the verdict of the jury.

The plaintiff in error also contends that the court erred in admitting immaterial evidence. The court will not reverse a case on the ground of the admission of immaterial evidence, unless from an examination of the record it *102 clearly appears the rights of the defendant were prejudiced thereby. Bates v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 401, 285 Pac. 847.

We find no error sufficient to warrant a reversal of the case, and for the reasons stated the cause is affirmed.