Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1935

Stanley v. State

Stanley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Decided October 11, 1935 · PER CURIAM.
50 P.2d 1150; 58 Okla. Crim. 106; 1935 OK CR 136; 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 135 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Stanley v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of the crime of burglary in the second degree, a third and subsequent offense, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of ten years, and appeals.

The time for filing brief on behalf of the plaintiff in error has expired. No brief has been filed in support of defendant’s assignments of error.

The record has been carefully examined. The testimony is conflicting, which was a question for the jury. There are no fundamental or prejudicial errors in the record. The jury after carefully considering the evidence found there was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant. The case is therefore affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.