Diamond v. State
Diamond v. State
46 P.2d 918; 57 Okla. Crim. 219
(Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
Diamond v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion case to- No. A-8809, 57 Okla. Cr. 214, 46 Pac. (2d) 966, just decided, involving the same defendant and the same charge except for a different transaction. The same questions are raised, and plaintiff in error’s brief differing from that filed in A-8809 only in referring to page numbers of the record; the state’s brief setting, up no additional matter and referring to its former brief.
Under the rule there laid down, the case is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.