Pitts v. State
Pitts v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant, J. D. (Red) Pitts, was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county,
No brief has been filed on behalf of defendant and no appearance was made in his behalf at the time the case was assigned for oral argument. Under those circumstances the record will be searched for fundamental error and if none is found the judgment will be affirmed.
We have examined the record herewith presented and find the information states a cause of action for unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and is supported by the evidence, which disclosed not only the possession of the liquor as alleged, but that the defendant was the possessor of a valid and subsisting federal retail liquor dealer’s license. There being no instructions, and the judgment and sentence being valid, and no prejudicial errors appearing in the record, the judgment and sentence of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, is accordingly affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.