Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Oklahoma /Cases /Oklahoma Courts of Civil and Criminal Appeals /

1956

131 Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma opinions from 1956.

  • Hopper v. State 302 P.2d 162, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Littke v. State 300 P.2d 684, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Place v. State 300 P.2d 666, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Megown v. State 300 P.2d 673, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Armstrong v. State 300 P.2d 766, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Application of Selby 300 P.2d 770, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Loel v. State 300 P.2d 1013, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Parris v. State 300 P.2d 687, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Matlock v. State 300 P.2d 771, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • McKinnon v. State 299 P.2d 535, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Cardwell v. State 300 P.2d 679, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Lytle v. State 299 P.2d 175, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Sharp v. State 300 P.2d 1017, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Morgan v. State 298 P.2d 1091, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Carothers v. State 299 P.2d 546, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Lankister v. State 298 P.2d 1088, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • In Re the Habeas Corpus of Yoder 298 P.2d 1083, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Hill v. State 298 P.2d 1066, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • In re the Habeas Corpus of Seaman 298 P.2d 1064, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • In re the Habeas Corpus of Wilson 298 P.2d 1071, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • State v. Hamilton 298 P.2d 1073, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Davis v. State 300 P.2d 1000, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Thompson v. State 298 P.2d 464, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Southard v. State 297 P.2d 585, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus by Watson 297 P.2d 569, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Lee v. State 297 P.2d 572, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Hendricks v. State 297 P.2d 576, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Application of Brown 297 P.2d 575, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • London v. State 297 P.2d 567, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Habeas Corpus of Neal 297 P.2d 570, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Application of Holloway 297 P.2d 574, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Starns v. State 297 P.2d 421, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Frizzell v. State 299 P.2d 547, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Gower v. State 298 P.2d 461, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Application of Dorsey 296 P.2d 514, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Lawson v. State 296 P.2d 515, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • State Ex Rel. Tayrien v. Doggett 296 P.2d 185, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • In Re Potts'petition 296 P.2d 180, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Cannon v. State 296 P.2d 202, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Slater v. State 296 P.2d 193, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Smith v. State 296 P.2d 187, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Cheshier v. State 296 P.2d 190, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Pumpkin v. State 295 P.2d 819, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Application of Cooley 295 P.2d 816, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Wyatt v. State 296 P.2d 222, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Application of Yarbrough 295 P.2d 826, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Application of Eckert 295 P.2d 814, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • In re Owens 295 P.2d 827, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Brownfield v. State 299 P.2d 539, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
  • Ellsworth v. State 295 P.2d 296, (Okla. Crim. App. 1956)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑