Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1994

Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Rogers

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Decided January 11, 1994 · Bailey, Hunter, Garrett

871 P.2d 443; 1994 OK CIV APP 3; 65 O.B.A.J. 1213; 1994 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 14; 1994 WL 101278 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge:

Ralph Rogers (Rogers) seeks review of an order of the Trial Court denying Rogers’ motion for new trial after grant of summary judgment to Kansas City Fire and Marine Insurance Company (Insurer) in Insurer’s subrogation action. Herein, Rogers asserts no liability to Insurer.

Rogers’ parents owned a rent house insured by Insurer, and Rogers rented the house from his parents. The house suffered smoke/fire damage when Rogers started a grease fire in the kitchen, and Insurer paid Rogers’ parents’ insurance claim therefor.

Insurer then commenced the instant sub-rogation claim against Rogers, alleging Rogers’ negligence in starting the grease fire and seeking recovery of the sum paid on Rogers’ parents’ insurance claim from Rogers. On Insurer’s' motion, the Trial Court granted summary judgment to Insurer, denied Rogers’ motion for new trial,' and awarded Insurer attorney fees and costs. Rogers appeals.

We find this case controlled by a previous decision of the Court of Appeals. 1 In that case, Judge Brightmire held that a landlord’s insurer has no claim for subrogation against the tenant for damages to landlord’s rented premises arising from tenant’s negligence absent agreement otherwise, as landlord and tenant are, in essence, co-insureds under landlord’s policy of insurance. 2 , 3 We there *444 fore hold the Trial Court erred in denying Rogers’ motion for new trial and in granting summary judgment to Insurer.

The order of the Trial Court is therefore REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for entry of judgment for Rogers.

HUNTER, P.J., and GARRETT, V.C.J., concur.

. Sutton v. Jondahl, 532 P.2d 478 (Okl.App. 1975).

. Sutton, 532 P.2d at 482.

. These jurisdictions have adopted this view. See, e.g., Alaska Ins. Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc., 623 P.2d 1216 (Alaska 1981); Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Auto Spring Supply Co., 59 Cal.App.3d 860, 131 Cal.Rptr. 211 (1976); Safeco Ins. Co. v. Weisgerber, 115 Idaho 428, 767 P.2d 271 (1989); Reeder v. Reeder, 217 Neb. 120, 348 N.W.2d 832 (1984); Safeco Ins. Co. v. Capri, 101 Nev. 429, 705 P.2d 659 (1985); Fashion Place Invs. Ltd. v. Salt Lake County Mental Health, 776 P.2d 941 (Utah App. 1989); Monterey Corp. v. Hart, 216 Va. 843, 224 S.E.2d 142 (1976); Cascade Trailer Court v. Beeson, 50 Wash.App. 678, 749 P.2d 761 (1988).

Contra, Neubauer v. Hostetter, 485 N.W.2d 87 (Iowa 1992); Page v. Scott, 263 Ark. 684, 567 S.W.2d 101 (1978).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.