Court on the Judiciary of Oklahoma, 2001

State ex rel. Edmondson v. Frizzell

Court on the Judiciary of Oklahoma · Decided November 27, 2001 · Hal, McBee, Ellis, Boudreau, Lumpkin, Thompson, Winchester, Winslow, Lanning, Lindley

37 P.3d 979; 2001 Okl Jud. 1; 2001 Okla. JUD LEXIS 1; 2001 WL 1518764 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAL WM. ELLIS, Vice Presiding Judge.

T1 Respondent seeks attorney fees and costs relating to his defense of an unsuceessful action before the Court on the Judiciary, under the authority of City Natl Bank and Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. Owens, 565 P.2d 4 (Okla. 1977), citing patently insufficient allegations contained in the Attorney General's petition.

12 Owens provides that a court has inherent equitable authority to award limited attorney fees against a party who has caused the wasted expenditures where that party has acted "in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reason[.]"

4 3 The Application for Attorney Fees and Costs is denied. The record does not establish that the action against Respondent was brought in bad faith or was vexatious, wanton or oppressive.

14 ELLIS, V.P.J., BOUDREAU, J., LUMPKIN, J., THOMPSON, J., and WINCHESTER, J., concur. 11 5 WINSLOW, J., disqualified. I 6 LANNING, J., LINDLEY, J., not participating.

Concurring Opinion

McBEE, J.,

concurring in result (by separate opinion).

1 The application for fines and costs was filed more than nine months after the filing of this court's decision, Frizzell v. Court on Judiciary, Trial Division, 2000 OK JUD 2, 8 P.3d 951.

¶ 2 Neither fundamental law or Court rule requires consideration of the application. Okla. Const. Art. VII-A; Rules 3, 6, and 7, Rules of the Court on the Judiciary, Appellate Division Rules of Procedure, eff. Nov. 1979. A post decision motion filing delay of more than thirty days is unreasonable. Consequently, I would dismiss the application.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.