Whitmore v. Singleton

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Whitmore v. Singleton

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-19-296-G AUDREY SINGLETON et al., Defendants. ORDER Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 30) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B)-(C). No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed within the time allowed, and no extension of time in which to object has been sought or granted. Judge Purcell expressly informed Plaintiff of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation and the consequences of failing to do so. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States,

950 F.2d 656, 659

(10th Cir. 1991). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety, as though fully set forth herein. This mater is DISMISSED without prejudice based upon Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with the Court’s orders. A separate judgment shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2019. fla □□□ United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown