Tillman v. Vlosich

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Tillman v. Vlosich

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

BARBARA D. TILLMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-18-1254-C ) KRISTOPHER WADE VLOSICH, ) DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ) VETERAN’S AFFAIRS, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the present action asserting claims for discrimination and/or hostile work environment. From the face of the Complaint, the type of discrimination alleged is unclear. However, Plaintiff attached a copy of a decision from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to her Complaint. That document notes her allegations before that body alleged racial, religious, and disability discrimination. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6). Defendant raises three claims in support of the request for dismissal. First, Defendant alleges Plaintiff has failed to name and serve the proper party. Second, Defendant argues Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to allege exhaustion. Finally, Defendant asserts Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to adequately allege her claims for discrimination. In response to Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff offers no argument or legal authority. Rather, she filed 180 pages of documents with no explanation or analysis. “A pro se litigant’s pleadings are to be construed liberally and held to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Hall v. Bellmon,

935 F.2d 1106, 1110

(10th Cir. 1991) (citations omitted). However, it is not “the proper function of the district court to assume the role of advocate for the pro se litigant.”

Id.

Applying these standards, Plaintiff's Complaint must be dismissed. The arguments in favor of dismissal are well supported and in the absence of any contrary argument by Plaintiff, the Court finds dismissal is appropriate. However, the Court will dismiss the matter without prejudice. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 16) is GRANTED and the matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2019.

United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown