IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

RICHARD ALLEN ROGERS

Plaintiff, Case No. 18-CIV-198-RAW-KEW vs.

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

ORDER Before the court are the following: Plaintiff=s Motion for Attorney=s Fees Under 42 U.S.C. ' 406(b) [Docket No. 23] and the Defendant=s Response [Docket No. 24]. The Defendant declines to assert a position on the reasonableness of Plaintiff’s request, but rather defers to the court’s discretion. In September 2019, this court rendered a final judgment in favor of the Plaintiff. The Commissioner issued a fully favorable decision, and a Notice of Award was issued on July 8, 2020. The instant motion was filed on July 20, 2020. In order to authorize payment of attorney fees pursuant to 42U.S.C. ' 406(b), a court must act as an Aindependent check, to assure that they yield reasonable results in particular cases.@ McGraw v. Barnhart,

(10th Cir. 2006). A district court should determine the reasonableness and timeliness of the attorney fee request prior to awarding fees.

at 502 and 505. There is a limit, however, to the amount of fees that can be awarded pursuant to ' 406(b): ACongress has provided one boundary line: Agreements are unenforceable to the extent that they

1 provide for fees exceeding 25 percent of the past-due benefits.@ Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,

(2002). The current request for attorney fees is less than 25% of past-due benefits awarded to Plaintiff. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Wrenn, ex rel. Wrenn v. Astrue,

(10th Cir. 2008) which states that Athe 25% limitation on fees for court representation

found in ' 406(b) is not itself limited by the amount of fees awarded by the Commissioner.@

. Thus, the combined attorney fees for representation before the Social Security Administration and on appeal to a district court are not limited to 25% of past-due benefits. After a review of the motion and supporting documents, the court finds that the fees requested are reasonable. A motion for the award of attorney fees under ' 406(b) should be filed within a Areasonable time of the Commissioner=s decision awarding benefits.@ McGraw, at 505. There is no specific time frame for the filing of the motion. The instant motion was filed less than thirty days after the Notice of Award was received by counsel The court finds that the request for attorney fees was

filed within a reasonable time. Plaintiff=s Motion for Attorney=s Fees Under 42 U.S.C. ' 406(b) [Docket No. 23] is GRANTED, and reasonable attorney=s fees are approved in the amount of $14,805.50. Further, pursuant to Wrenn, counsel for Plaintiff is directed to refund the amount of the EAJA award to Plaintiff. Ordered this 25th day of August, 2020. _____________________________ RONALD A. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

2