Conrady v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Conrady v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

JUSTIN CONRADY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-19-00153-PRW ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner ) of the Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff, Justin Conrady, instituted this action seeking judicial review of the Defendant Commissioner’s final decision denying his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 423

, 1382. Consistent with

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), the case was referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, who has issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20) recommending that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20) by December 4, 2019. No objections have been filed as of this date. Having failed to object, the Plaintiff has waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 20).1 Accordingly, the Court

1 United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop.,

73 F.3d 1057

, 1059–60 (10th Cir. 1996); cf.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation in accordance with § 636(b)(1), AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s decision, and ORDERS that judgment issue forthwith in accordance with the provisions of sentence four of

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of January, 2020.

PATRICK R. WYRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”).

Reference

Status
Unknown