Whitmore v. Shifflett

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Whitmore v. Shifflett

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-18-1249-G ) FNU SIFFLETT et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER This matter comes before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 37) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and (C). Plaintiff, a pre-trial detainee, brought this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

, alleging various violations of his constitutional rights. Judge Mitchell recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See R&R at 3. Judge Mitchell expressly informed Plaintiff of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation and the consequences of failing to do so. See

id. at 4

. Plaintiff has not filed a written objection to the Report and Recommendation within the allotted time period, nor has he requested additional time to object. Finding that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation, see Moore v. United States,

950 F.2d 656, 659

(10th Cir. 1991), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, as though fully set forth herein. It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 37) is ADOPTED, and the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 6) is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling. A separate judgment shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2020.

CHARLES B. GOODWIN United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown