Wright v. Rivers
Wright v. Rivers
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JONATHAN RUSSELL WRIGHT, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Vv. ) Case No. CIV-20-345-SLP ) FNU RIVERS, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Suzanne Mitchell entered May 1, 2020 [Doc. No. 13]. No objection to the R. & R. has been filed; nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the R. & R. [Doc. No. 13] is ADOPTED in its entirety and Petitioner’s § 2241 Petition is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.' IT IS SO ORDERED this 3" day of June, 2020. buf SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
' Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires a district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability (“COA”) when it enters a final order adverse to a petitioner. However, “a federal prisoner . . . does not need a COA to appeal a final judgment in a § 2241 case.” Eldridge v. Berkebile,
791 F.3d 1239, 1241(10th Cir. 2015). Thus, the Court need not consider a COA in this case.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown