Montgomery v. Department of Homeland Security
Montgomery v. Department of Homeland Security
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
THOMAS R. MONTGOMERY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) NO. CIV-20-0318-HE ) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ) SECURITY, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed an action seeking relief under
42 U.S.C. § 1983and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388(1971), claiming violations of his constitutional rights. On April 10, 2020, U.S. Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the denial of plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the dismissal without prejudice of this conditionally filed action unless plaintiff pays the full filing fee within twenty-one days from the date of any order adopting the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by May 1, 2020 and was granted an extension until June 1, 2020 to object. Plaintiff did not object to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, plaintiff has waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. Cassanova v. Ulibarri,
595 F.3d 1120, 1123(10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Mitchell’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. #6], DENIES plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2], and ORDERS plaintiff to pay the full filing fee within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that if he does not pay the full filing fee within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 9" day of June, 2020.
Cf, ae — EaFION ~D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown