Ross v. Pettigrew

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Ross v. Pettigrew

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

BRYAN ROSS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) NO. CIV-20-0963-HE ) LUKE PETTIGREW, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER Petitioner Bryan Ross, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed a habeas petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that his trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear his case. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell. Judge Mitchell granted petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered that an initial partial filing fee of $2.50 be paid by October 20, 2020. Petitioner was granted an extension until November 10, 2020, to pay the partial fee. Petitioner has failed to pay the partial filing fee, and Judge Mitchell has issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be dismissed. The Report advised petitioner of his right to object to the Report by December 1, 2020. Petitioner has failed to object to the Report thereby waiving his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. Casanova v. Ulibarri,

595 F.3d 1120, 1123

(10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #8]. The petition [Doc. #1] is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 17" day of December, 2020. lhl thy, JO ATON Y STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown