Jorden v. Kuykendall
Jorden v. Kuykendall
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
HENRY NOAH JORDEN and ) LARENA M. JORDEN, ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-CV-00060-JWD ) BRADLEY E. KUYKENDALL and ) MARVIN WINDOWS OF ) TENNESSEE, LLC, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Marvin Windows of Tennessee, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) filed on March 5, 2021. [Doc. No. 8]. On May 5, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint in this removed action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2). [Doc. No. 23]. On May 13, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint against Defendants. [Doc. No. 24]. Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint “supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp.,
929 F.2d 1515, 1517(10th Cir. 1991); see Predator Int’l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.,
793 F.3d 1177, 1180–81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers,
482 F.3d 1244, 1254(10th Cir. 2007). Thus, the Motion is moot. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Marvin Windows of Tennessee, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 8] as moot and without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of May 2021.
ei W. DISHMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown