Claudio v. Bates

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Claudio v. Bates

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

JONATHAN ANIBAL CLAUDIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-20-1216-D ) TOM BATES, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

O R D E R This matter comes before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7] issued by United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and (C). Judge Erwin finds that Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order to cure certain deficiencies – and otherwise failed to pursue this civil rights case regarding a denial of parole – and that the case should be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. The record reflects no timely objection to the Report nor request for additional time to object. Plaintiff was expressly advised of the right to object and the implied waiver rule. See R&R at 2. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of the issues addressed in the Report. See Moore v. United States,

950 F.2d 656, 659

(10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 E. 30th St.,

73 F.3d 1057, 1060

(10th Cir. 1996). Further, for the reasons stated by Judge Erwin, the Court finds that the case should be dismissed without prejudice to a future filing. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7] is ADOPTED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and a separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28" day of January, 2021.

\ ty Q QP: TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown