Lopez v. Vladimir

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Lopez v. Vladimir

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA OSCAR PEREZ LOPEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No. CIV-20-255-SLP ) HOLY VLADIMIR,! et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell entered November 18, 2020 [Doc. No. 21]. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted.” IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 21] is ADOPTED in its entirety and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A separate judgment of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25" day of February, 2021. LxrZ bop SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

' Plaintiff transposes this Defendant’s name. The correct designation for this Defendant is “Vladimir Holy, M.D.” ? Plaintiff submitted additional information on February 5, 2021 [Doc. No. 22]. However, by failing to submit a timely objection, Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. Allman vy. Colvin,

813 F.3d 1326, 1329

(10th Cir. 2016); United States v. 2121 E. 30th St.,

73 F.3d 1057, 1060

(10th Cir. 1996).

Reference

Status
Unknown