Beck v. Darrington

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

ERIC RYAN BECK, ) )

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-20-678-SLP )

FNU DARRINGTON, et al., ) )

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell entered March 2, 2021 [Doc. No. 42]. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted.1 Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 22] is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED. A separate Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

1 The Court’s docket reflects that the Report and Recommendation was returned as “undeliverable” on March 29, 2021. Plaintiff is responsible for providing notice of any change of address to the Court. See LCvR 5.4(a) (requiring written notice of a change of address and further providing that papers sent by the Court are “deemed delivered if sent to the last known address given to the court.”); see also Theede v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 172 F.3d 1262, 1267-68 (10th Cir. 1999) (pro se plaintiff who failed to provide any change of address waived right to review of report and recommendation by failing to make a timely objection).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 31‘ day of March, 2021.

SCOTT L. PALK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE