Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Clark v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

HERMAN TRACY CLARK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. CIV-20-981-C ) OKLAHOMA PARDON ) AND PAROLE BOARD, ) ) Defendant. )

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff has filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) entered in this case. Plaintiff’s Response was not received by the Court until March 26, 2021. This is significant, as the deadline for filing any Objection to the R&R was March 10, 2021. However, the Certificate of Mailing within Plaintiff’s Objection states he placed it in the prison’s legal mail system on March 4, 2021. The Court finds the Plaintiff is entitled to application of the “mailbox rule” and his Objection will be considered timely filed. See Price v. Philpot,

420 F.3d 1158, 1165

(10th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the Court’s March 24, 2021, Order adopting the R&R (Dkt. No. 13) and March 24, 2021, Judgment of Dismissal (Dkt. No. 14) are STRICKEN. The Court has reviewed the matter de novo and considered the arguments raised in Plaintiff’s Objection. Based on that review, the Court finds no error in Judge Green’s Order. As Judge Green noted, the Supreme Court has held there is no constitutionally- protected interest in a conditional release prior to completion of sentence. See Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal and Corr. Complex,

442 U.S. 1, 7

(1979). Accordingly, the Court adopts in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 10). For the reasons set forth in that R&R and this Order, judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. This matter is DISMISSED. A separate judgment will issue. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2021.

ROBIN J. pth United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown