Knox v. Carlisle

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Knox v. Carlisle

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

ANTONE LAMANDINGO KNOX, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) NO. CIV-21-0422-HE ) NO. CIV-21-0423-HE FNU CARLISLE, et al., ) NO. CIV-21-0424-HE ) Defendants. )

ORDER

Plaintiff Antone Lamandingo Knox, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed these three § 1983 actions alleging violations of his constitutional rights. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and (C) the matters were referred to Magistrate Judges Gary M. Purcell and Suzanne Mitchell for initial proceedings. Judge Purcell and Judge Mitchell have issued Reports and Recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. After plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, the court sua sponte extended his deadline to object to the Reports. The court then granted plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to object and ordered that any objection be filed on or before July 24, 2021. Plaintiff has not objected to the Reports thereby waiving his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues they addressed. Casanova v. Ulibarri,

595 F.3d 1120, 1123

(10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Reports and Recommendations [Doc. Nos. 7 in each case]. Plaintiff’s Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. Nos. 2 in CIV-21- 0422 and CIV-21-0423 and Doc. #3 in CIV-21-424] are DENIED. If the full filing fees have not been paid within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, the cases will be dismissed without prejudice. IT ISSO ORDERED. Dated this 9" day of August, 2021. ip Lh JO ATON ~D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown