United States District Court, Oklahoma Western, 2021

Bence v. Womble

Bence v. Womble
United States District Court, Oklahoma Western · Decided September 13, 2021
Bence v. Womble

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

KENNETH RAY BENCE, ) )

Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-21-558-J )

MICHAEL WOMBLE, et al., ) )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636. [Doc. No. 3]. On August 3, 2021, Judge Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the abstention doctrine set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and Plaintiff’s appeal of a state court decision that is currently pending before the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. [Doc. No. 10]. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by August 23, 2021. No objection has been filed. Plaintiff has therefore waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] and DISMISSES this case without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s pending appeal in state court and Younger.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13" day of September, 2021.

BERNARD M. JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.