Hayat v. LNU

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Hayat v. LNU

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

ADAM HAYAT, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) NO. CIV-21-1163-HE ) FNU LNU, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER

Petitioner Adam Hayat filed this case seeking relief pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings. After reviewing petitioner’s filings, Judge Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petitioner be construed as a

28 U.S.C. § 2255

petition and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The Report advised petitioner of his right to object to the Report by January 3, 2022. Petitioner has not objected to the Report1 thereby waiving his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. Casanova v. Ulibarri,

595 F.3d 1120, 1123

(10th Cir. 2010).

1 Petitioner has filed a notice to the court outlining his purported Due Process allegations, but the notice is dated December 14, 2021 — the same date the Report issued — and received by the court December 20, 2021. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #5]. Petitioner’s petition, construed as a § 2255 petition, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 24" day of January, 2022. ip Lh ae — Beeson STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown