Williams v. Nunn

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Williams v. Nunn

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

BRIAN G. WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-22-7-SLP ) SCOTT NUNN, ) ) Respondent. )

O R D E R

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin entered on January 12, 2022 [Doc. No. 9]. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 9] is ADOPTED in its entirety and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered contemporaneously with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability (“COA”) when it enters a final order adverse to a petitioner. A COA may issue only upon “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2). “A petitioner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 327

(2003). Upon consideration, the Court finds the requisite standard is not met in this case. Therefore, a COA is denied. This denial shall be included in the judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10° day of February, 2022. Lu xz bop SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown