Warledo v. Crow

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Warledo v. Crow

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

GERALD WARLEDO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) NO. CIV-22-0086-HE ) SCOTT CROW, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER

Petitioner Gerald Warledo, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed his habeas petition pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

attacking his state court conviction based on McGirt v. Oklahoma,

140 S.Ct. 2452

(2020). Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings. Upon initial review of the petition, Judge Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as a second or successive habeas petition. Absent an order from the court of appeals authorizing a second or successive habeas petition, this court may not consider such a petition.

28 U.S.C. § 2244

(b)(3)(A). The Report advised petitioner of his right to object to the Report by April 15, 2022. Petitioner has not objected to the Report, thereby waiving his right o appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. Casanova v. Ulibarri,

595 F.3d 1120, 1123

(10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #9]. Petitioner’s petition is DISMISSED. Further, because the petition does not meet the requirements of

28 U.S.C. § 2244

(b)(2), the court declines to transfer the petition to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration as an application to file a second or successive habeas petition. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 11" day of May, 2022.

4 cote IEE AION STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown